How Can Textile Products Be Recycled?

Most end-of-life textiles are still landfilled or burned, and only a sliver becomes new clothing again. Multiple studies and policy briefings converge on the figure that ~1% of clothing material is recycled back into new apparel, highlighting the scale of the challenge and the opportunity for systems change.

2) Core recycling pathways

A. Mechanical recycling (physical reprocessing)

Textiles are collected → sorted → cleaned → shredded/garnetted → re-spun or felted. This route is mature and relatively low-cost, but repeated mechanical processing shortens fibers, often yielding downcycled outputs (e.g., padding, insulation, wiping cloths) rather than like-for-like yarns—especially when feedstock is blended or contaminated.

Examples.

• 100% cotton garments can be cut and re-spun into new yarns.
• Blends (e.g., poly-cotton) require prior separation; otherwise the output quality drops.

B. Chemical (molecular) recycling

Here, chemistry depolymerizes polymers (e.g., polyester/PET) into monomers (e.g., BHET) that can be re-polymerized into virgin-quality fibers—enabling closed loops and handling colorants/contaminants better than mechanical routes. Recent lab-to-pilot advances include microwave-assisted glycolysis for mixed textile waste and enzymatic depolymerization of PET; both target the hard problem of blends. Scale-up is underway but still costly and infrastructure-intensive.

Examples.

• MW-assisted glycolysis can split polyester from cotton/spandex blends and recover high-purity intermediates for re-polymerization.
• Enzymatic PET “bio-recycling” can turn dyed/complex polyester textiles back into PET monomers suitable for new fibers.

C. Thermal recovery (when fiber-to-fiber isn’t feasible)

For contaminated or non-recyclable textiles, pyrolysis/gasification/liquefaction convert waste into syngas, oils, or char—useful as fuels or chemical feedstocks. This is downcycling from a materials standpoint, but it can valorize otherwise unrecoverable streams.

D. Biological routes for cellulosics

Microbial or enzymatic processes can break down natural fibers (cotton/viscose) into smaller molecules or pulp for regenerated cellulosics. Today these routes are slower and less mature, but research continues alongside hybrid chemo-bio approaches.

3) The practical flow

1. Collection & sorting. From households and businesses, items are sorted by fiber type, color, construction, and condition—a critical step that determines whether an item is re-use, fiber-to-fiber, or downcycling. Advanced NIR sorting and digital IDs (product passports) can improve accuracy and throughput.
2. Pre-treatment. Remove buttons/zips, de-label, and clean/sanitize; for chemical routes, prepare controlled particle size.
3. Conversion. Choose mechanical (shred/garnett/re-spin), chemical (dissolve/depolymerize/re-polymerize), or thermal (pyrolysis/gasification) based on the target product and feedstock constraints.
4. Re-manufacture. Turn outputs into new fibers/yarns/fabrics, nonwovens, panels, or energy/chemical feedstocks.

4) Where the outputs go

• Closed-loop (“textile-to-textile”): turning old garments into new garments—chemically with PET, or mechanically with longer cellulosic fibers where feasible. It’s the north star but still limited by sorting, blending, and economics.
• Open-loop (downcycling): into insulation, padding, industrial wipes, geotextiles, etc., extending life but not preserving fiber quality.
• Upcycling: design-led remanufacturing (patchwork, repair, creative re-cutting) that can increase value without heavy processing.

5) System bottlenecks

• Blended fabrics (e.g., cotton-poly) and elastane content complicate separation and quality control.
• Economics & infrastructure: mechanical is cheapest but often downcycles; chemical/enzymatic plants require high capex and steady, well-sorted feedstock.
• Design for recycling remains inconsistent (mixed trims, coatings, dark dyes).
• Scale: despite progress, the textile-to-textile share is still ~1%.

6) Policy moves (accelerators)

• The EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles and the 2025 revision of the Waste Framework Directive introduce textile EPR (extended producer responsibility)—making producers finance collection, sorting, and recycling, with harmonized rules across member states. This is designed to boost high-quality recycling and re-use markets.

7) What works now—and what’s next

Right now:

• Prioritize re-use and repair first; then mechanical recycling for mono-material flows (e.g., 100% cotton) and chemical routes for PET-rich streams where infrastructure exists.

Near-term breakthroughs to watch:

• Microwave-assisted glycolysis and related chemistries for mixed blends.
• Enzymatic PET depolymerization moving from demo to industrial plants.
• Digital product passports & advanced sorting to unlock cleaner feedstock at scale.

Textile recycling spans mechanical, chemical, thermal, and biological routes, each suited to different feedstocks and outcomes. To escape downcycling and raise that ~1% into a meaningful circular flow, the sector needs design-for-recycling, better sorting, scalable blend-separation tech, and EPR-backed collection infrastructure—all of which are now advancing in policy and pilot-to-plant reality.

About Pingio Home